mogarmorelikerungar:

Michael calling out Sam’s bullshit

mogarmorelikerungar:

Michael calling out Sam’s bullshit

spookiestbackslider:

you’ve gotta be fucking kidding me.
After #ReportSamPepper got his first groping video taken down, now he’s uploaded another one??? whaT THE FUCK????
this guy doesn’t learn a fucking lesson, he’s STILL trying to profit from sexual assault. he’s molesting people for profit. EVEN AFTER HIS FIRST VIDEO WAS TAKEN DOWN
I’M FUCKIN LIVID. REPORT THE SHIT OUT OF THIS

spookiestbackslider:

you’ve gotta be fucking kidding me.

After #ReportSamPepper got his first groping video taken down, now he’s uploaded another one??? whaT THE FUCK????

this guy doesn’t learn a fucking lesson, he’s STILL trying to profit from sexual assault. he’s molesting people for profit. EVEN AFTER HIS FIRST VIDEO WAS TAKEN DOWN

I’M FUCKIN LIVID. REPORT THE SHIT OUT OF THIS

thisiskatsblog:

soloontherocks:

Please leave this caption when reblogging.
Definitions of orientations MUST come from the people that belong to those orientations. Pansexuals and monosexuals do not get to define bisexuality. Bisexuals and monosexuals do not get to define pansexuality.
So knock it off with this “bisexuality is attraction to men and women” binary crap, because it isn’t true and it’s fucking annoying. And drop the “pansexuality is synonymous with bisexuality” crap while you’re at it.
Bisexuality exists; it is the attraction to multiple genders. Pansexuality exists; it is attraction to all genders. Bisexuality and pansexuality overlap. Pansexuality is a more specific term synonymous with a specific subgroup of bisexuality. The desire for a more specific term for your orientation is legitimate. The desire to have other people recognize that just because the linguistic prefix of your orientation’s name suggests two does not mean your orientation is nonbinary-phobic is also legitimate.
We are allies. We are the closest related sexual orientations out there. We should be working together to fight the very real issues we both face, and the issues we each face individually. Instead we’re bitching about fucking dictionary terms.
Knock this shit off.
Note regarding pansexual definition: as far as I am aware the definition listed above is widely agreed upon by pansexuals. HOWEVER I would very much prefer to cite an “official” pansexual organization rather than someone’s personal blog, but I am unable to find one. If someone can provide me such an organization, I will edit the above image to include it.
Now can we drop this infighting bullshit and focus on the real goals? Namely, destroying monosexist prejudices beneath our exquisitely-booted polysexual heel?

"The desire for a more specific term for your orientation is legitimate. The desire to have other people recognize that just because the linguistic prefix of your orientation’s name suggests two does not mean your orientation is nonbinary-phobic is also legitimate.We are allies. We are the closest related sexual orientations out there. We should be working together to fight the very real issues we both face, and the issues we each face individually.”
I don’t think I have ever seen my feelings about this worded more accurately.

thisiskatsblog:

soloontherocks:

Please leave this caption when reblogging.

Definitions of orientations MUST come from the people that belong to those orientations. Pansexuals and monosexuals do not get to define bisexuality. Bisexuals and monosexuals do not get to define pansexuality.

So knock it off with this “bisexuality is attraction to men and women” binary crap, because it isn’t true and it’s fucking annoying. And drop the “pansexuality is synonymous with bisexuality” crap while you’re at it.

Bisexuality exists; it is the attraction to multiple genders. Pansexuality exists; it is attraction to all genders. Bisexuality and pansexuality overlap. Pansexuality is a more specific term synonymous with a specific subgroup of bisexuality. The desire for a more specific term for your orientation is legitimate. The desire to have other people recognize that just because the linguistic prefix of your orientation’s name suggests two does not mean your orientation is nonbinary-phobic is also legitimate.

We are allies. We are the closest related sexual orientations out there. We should be working together to fight the very real issues we both face, and the issues we each face individually. Instead we’re bitching about fucking dictionary terms.

Knock this shit off.

Note regarding pansexual definition: as far as I am aware the definition listed above is widely agreed upon by pansexuals. HOWEVER I would very much prefer to cite an “official” pansexual organization rather than someone’s personal blog, but I am unable to find one. If someone can provide me such an organization, I will edit the above image to include it.

Now can we drop this infighting bullshit and focus on the real goals? Namely, destroying monosexist prejudices beneath our exquisitely-booted polysexual heel?

"The desire for a more specific term for your orientation is legitimate. The desire to have other people recognize that just because the linguistic prefix of your orientation’s name suggests two does not mean your orientation is nonbinary-phobic is also legitimate.We are allies. We are the closest related sexual orientations out there. We should be working together to fight the very real issues we both face, and the issues we each face individually.”

I don’t think I have ever seen my feelings about this worded more accurately.


gaywrites:

It’s Bi Visibility/Celebrate Bisexuality Day! Learn more and find ways to celebrate in your community here. Fellow bisexuals, I salute you! 


(Source: hiddlesy)

me seeing a video game: ok but can I play as a girl?

This guy has some of the best investment ideas I’ve ever heard in my life.

(Source: dailypawnee)

All this Sam Pepper outrage is amazing.

jayjsupremacy:

So we’re gonna rally against Shane Dawson for his racism and blackface next right? 

Right?

"for the whole of the x factor i didn’t have a solo which, for me, was a tough pill to swallow. i was delighted but at the same time, couldn’t really understand why i was in the band. that was really low, that feeling of not having a purpose, of just being along for the ride."

~louis, where we are book (x)

(Source: slutzouis)


xxvalleygirlxx:

Kristen Stewart, Zooey Deschanel, Jennifer Aniston, Katherine Heigl, Blake Lively and a whole flurry of mediocre white actresses (who btw play the same roles OVER AND OVER) are always offered roles. Meanwhile, Oscar nominated/winning black actresses (who have won other awards prestigious as well) are struggling to remain relevant. Just because there are a lot of black led TV shows coming this fall, that doesn’t mean the struggle is over or lessening. Many of these actresses have had to move onto TV roles or do both because they haven’t been offered enough (or appropriate) roles. 

Chile

(Source: shady-heaux)

funnyforsmile:

Some guys from my hall snap chatted me- took me a second…

funnyforsmile:

Some guys from my hall snap chatted me- took me a second…

the13thdoctorbetterbeginger:

riversnogs:

It is the year after the Battle of Hogwarts. School is starting again. And the thestrals are confused by all of the attention they are getting.

oh

oh no

"I went through a whole Australia tour calling my promoter Dave and on the last day, someone was like, ‘Hey, Nick!’ And I was like, what…? And then, you know when you like try and cover it up and like, you’re there having a conversation and be like, ‘Ah, Nick, yeah it’s really cool to hang out, yeah Nick, it’s all good Nick,’ like overcompensating. But literally for a whole tour he didn’t correct me! Like I called him Dave once and he never corrected me, so he was from then on Dave."

~Ed Sheeran, Toronto, September 18, 2014. (via littlebitofbass)
thedandyunderworld:

Probably one of the best costumes from the con that I’ve seen.

thedandyunderworld:

Probably one of the best costumes from the con that I’ve seen.